Los espejos de Ciro. Tipos y modelos de monarca en la Ciropedia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051856Palabras clave:
Jenofonte, Ciropedia, pensamiento político, filosofías socráticasResumen
En los últimos años los estudios sobre la filosofía de Jenofonte han crecido, especialmente respecto de cuestiones éticas y políticas. Un punto especialmente discutido ha sido el problema de la estructura anímica o psicológica de Ciro, el protagonista de la Ciropedia. No obstante, practicamente nada se ha dicho sobre los otros reyes de Ciropedia: Astiages, Cambises, Creso, Ciaxares, el Asirio. Este trabajo buscará ofrecer una caracterización e interpretación de estos personajes analizando cómo se desarrolla su actuar político.
Descargas
Referencias
Carlier, Pierre (2010), “The idea of imperial monarchy in Xenophon's Cyropaedia”, in V. Gray, Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Xenophon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—— (1978). “L'idée de monarchie imperiale dans la Cyropédie de Xénophon”. Ktema 3: 133-63.
Bartlett, Robert (2015). “How to rule the world: an introduction to Xenophon's the education of Cyrus”, American Political Science Review 109: 143-154.
Danzig, Gabriel (2012). “The best of the achaemenids: benevolence, self-interest and the ironic reading of Cyropaedia”, en F. Hobden & C. Tuplin, Xenophon: ethical principles and historical enquiry. Leiden: Brill, 499-540
Due, Bodil (1989). The Cyropaedia. Xenophon’s aims and methods. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Faulkner, Robert (2016). The case for greatness: honorable ambition and Its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Field, Laura (2012). “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: educating our political hopes”, The Journal of Politics 74: 723-738.
Gera, Deborah (1993), Xenophon’s Cyropaedia. style, genre and literary technique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, Vivianne (2013), “Xenophon’s Eudaimonia”, en de Luise, F. y Stavru, A., Socratica III. Studies on Socrates, the Socratics and the ancient socratic literature. Academia Verlag: Sankt Augustin.
—— (2011). Xenophon’s mirror of princes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, David (2005). “Persians as centaurs in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 135: 177-207.
Mueller-Goldingen, Christian (1995). Untersuchungen zu Xenophons Kyrupädie. Stuttgart y Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
Nadon, Christopher (2001). Xenophon’s Prince. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Newell, W.R. (2013). Tyranny. A New Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— (1987), “Superlative Virtue: The Problem of Monarchy in Aristotle’s Politics”, The Western Political Quarterly 40: 159-178.
Reisert, Joseph (2009). “Ambition and Corruption in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus”, Polis 26: 296-314.
Rubin, Leslie (1989). “Love and Politics in Xenophon's Cyropaedia”, Interpretation, 16: 391-415.
Sandridge, Norman (2012). Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honored. The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus. Washington: Center for Hellenic Studies.
Smith Pangle, Lorraine (2017). “Xenophon on the Psychology of Supreme Political Ambition”, American Political Science Review 111: 308-21.
Tamiolaki, Mélina (2017). “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Tentative Answers to an Enigma”, en Flower. M. The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tatum James (1989). Xenophons Imperial Fiction. On the Education of Cyrus. Princeton: Princeton University press.
Whidden, Christopher (2007). “Deception in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia”, Interpretation, 34: 129-156.
