Yo lo reconocería por su voz… El caso de Emilio Berkhoff
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051851Palabras clave:
Identificación de voces en contextos forenses, reconocimiento del hablante por testigos auditivos no profesionalesResumen
Durante la comisión de un crimen, testigos o víctimas, expuestos al habla del agresor pueden ser llamados, en forma posterior, a reconocer la voz de quien se sospecha es el autor del delito, con el fin de establecer si ellos la reconocerían como la voz del delincuente. Un ejemplo de esta situación, donde se vio involucrado el testimonio de testigos auditivos, fue durante el proceso del caso de Emilio Berkhoff (Chile, 2015), el joven universitario que fue declarado culpable de los delitos de porte ilegal de armas y municiones y condenado a cinco años y un día de cárcel. El caso no estuvo exento de cierta controversia debido a las declaraciones públicas del imputado sobre supuestas violaciones al debido proceso. En este trabajo se revisa el procedimiento ocupado para la recolección de la evidencia auditiva a la luz de los criterios más ampliamente compartidos sobre la materia.
Descargas
Referencias
Aitken, Colin y Taroni, Franco (2010). Estadística y evaluación de la evidencia para expertos forenses. Madrid: Dykinson: 34-39.
Bahr, Huntley y Pass, Kimberley (1996). “The influence of style-shifting on voice identification”. Forensic Linguistics 3 (1): 24-38.
Blomberg, Mats; Elenius, Daniel; Zetterholm, Elisabeth (2004). “Speaker verification scores and acoustic analysis of a profesional impersonator”, Proceedings of FONETIK 2004, (Dept. of Linguistics, Stockholm University).
Bricker, Peter D. y Pruzansky, Sandra (1996). “Effects of stimulus content y duration on talker identification”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 40: 1441-1449.
Broeders, A. y Rietveld, A. (1995) “Speaker identification by earwitnesses”. En J.P. Köster y J.P. Braun (Eds.), Studies in Forensic Phonetics. Trier: University Press: 24-40.
Bull Ray y Clifford Brian (1999). “Earwitness testimony”. In Heaton-Armstrong A., Shepherd E., Wolchover D. eds. Analysing witness testimony: A guide for legal practitioners and other professionals. London: Blackstone Press: 194-206.
—— (1984). “Earwitness Voice Recognition Accuracy”. En Wells, Gary y Loftus, Elizabeth (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 92-123.
Clifford, Brian (1980). “Voices Identification by Human Listeners: On Earwitness Reliability”, Law and Human Behavior 4: 373-394.
Clifford, Brian R.; Rathborn, Harriet; Bull, Ray (1981). “The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy”, Law and Human Behavior 5: 201-2018.
Deffenbacher, Kenneth, et al. (1989). “Relevance of Voice Identification Research to Criteria for Evaluating Reliability of an Identification”. Journal of Psychology, 123: 109-119.
Hollien, Harry (1990). The acoustics of crime. New York: Plenum.
Hollien, Harry; Majewski, Wojciech; Doherty, Thomas E. (1982). “Perceptual identification of voice under normal, stress, and disguise speaker conditions”. Journal of Phonetics 10: 139-148.
Kassin, Saul M.; Dror, Itiel E.; Kukucka Jeff (2013). “The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions”, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2: 42-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
Kerstholt, José H.; Jansen, Noortje J. M.; Van Amelsvoort, Adri G., y Broeders, A. P. A. (2006). “Earwitnesses: Effects of accent, retention and telephone. Applied Cognitive Psychology”, 20(2): 187-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1175
Kreiman, Jody y Sidtis, Diana (2011). Foundations of Voice Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Voice Production and Perception. UK: Wiley-Blackwell: 237-259.
Kunzel, Hermann J. (2000). “Effects of voice disguise on speaking fundamental frecuency”. Forensic Linguistics 7: 149-179.
—— (1994). “Current approaches to forensic speaker recognition”, Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Automatic Speaker Recognition, Identification and Verification: 135-142.
Ladefoged, Jenny y Ladefoged Peter (1980). “The ability of listeners to identify voices”. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 49: 43–51.
LaRiviere, Conrad (1982). “Some acoustic and perceptual correlates of speaker identification”. in Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: 558-564.
Laub, Cindy (2010). Can earwitness limitations be overcome by the court system? Strategies to help mock jurors appreciate the limitations of earwitness testimony. PhD dissertation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Morales, Ana María y Welsch, Gherman (2011). El reconocimiento de imputados en Chile y a nivel comparado [informes]. Santiago de Chile: Fundación Paz Ciudadana, 60 p., Solicitar como: DOC/458
Morrison, Geoffrey Steward (2009). “Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift”, Science & Justice 49: 298-308. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.002, que a su vez es una versión revisada de una presentación realizada en el 2nd International Conference on Evidence Law and Forensic Science, Beijing, China, 25–26 julio, 2009. Traducción de Carlos Curiá (Estudios Fónicos / Cuadernos de Trabajo 1 (2011), 1-38).
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart; Enzinger, Ewald; Zhang, Cuiling (2018). “Forensic Speech Science”. En Freckelton I., Selby H. (Eds.). Expert Evidence (Cap. 99). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters: 86-99.
McGehee, Frances (1947). “The reliability of the identification of the human voice”. Journal of General Psychology 17: 249-271.
Nolan, Francis; McDougall, Kirsty; y Hudson, Toby (2013). “Effects of the telephone on perceived voice similarity-Implications for voice line-ups”, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law: 20, 229–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558 /ijsll.v20i2.229
Öhman, Lisa; Eriksson, Anders; y Granhag, Pär Anders (2013). “Angry voices from the past and present: Effects on adults’ and children’s earwitness testimony”. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 10: 57-70. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/jip.1381
Orchard, Tara L. y Yarmey, Daniel A. (1995). “The effects of whispers, voice-sample duration and voice distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification”. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 249-260.
Papcun, George; Kreiman, Jody; Davis, Anthony (1989). “Long-term memory for unfamiliar voices”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85: 913-925.
Rathborn, Harriet; Bull, Ray; y Clifford, Brian (1981). “Voice recognition over the telephone”, Journal of Police Science and Administration 9: 280-284.
Read, Daniel y Craik, Fergus I. M. (1995). “Earwitness identification: Some influences on voice recognition” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1: 6-18.
Reich, Alan R. (1981). “Detecting the presence of vocal disguise in the male voice”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69:1458-1461.
Reich, Alan R. y Duke, James (1979). “Effects of selected vocal disguise upon speaker identification by listening”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66:1023-1028.
Rosas, Claudia, Sommerhoff, Jorge y Sáez, César (2018). “Identificación de voces por auditores profanos no nativos”. Alpha (Osorno), (46), 129-150. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.4067/S0718-22012018000100129.
Rose, Philip (2002). Forensic speaker identification. London: Taylor and Francis.
Rose, Philip y Duncan Sally (1995). “Naive auditory identification and discrimination of similar voices of familiar speakers”. Forensic Linguistics 2: 1-17.
Sarwar, Farhan; Allwood, Carl Martin; Zetterholm, Elisabeth (2014). “Earwitnesses: The type of voice lineup affects the proportion of correct identifications and the realism in confidence judgments”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21: 139-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/ ijsll.v21i1.139
Saslove, Howard y Yarmey, Daniel (1980). “Long-Term Auditory Memory: Speaker Identification”. Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 111-116.
Solan, Lawrence M. y Tiersma Peter M. (2003). “Hearing voices: Speaker identification in court”. Hastings Law Journal 54: 373–435.
Van Lancker, Diana; Kreiman, Jody; Emmorey, Karen (1985). “Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I. Recognition of backward voices”. Journal of Phonetics 13:19-38.
Van Wallendael Lori R.; Surace, Amy; Hall-Parsons, Deborah Hall; Brown, Melissa (1994). “Earwitness’ voice recognition: Factors affecting accuracy and impact on jurors”. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8: 661–677.
Yarmey, A. Daniel; Yarmey, A. Linda; Yarmey, Meagan J.; Parliament, Lisa (2001). “Common sense beliefs and the identification of familiar voices”. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15: 283-299.
Zetterholm, Elisabeth; Sarwar, Farhan; Thorvaldsson, Valgeir; Allwood, Carl Martin (2012). “Earwitnesses: The effect of type of vocal differences on correct identification and confidence accuracy”, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 19: 219-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/ ijsll.v19i2.219
