You too, Obama? The argumentative force of the label Conspiracy theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-22012025000614054Keywords:
Arguments, argumentative force, conspiracy theory, making present, political oppositionAbstract
In this article I analyze the explicit use of the label conspiracy theory in political communication from the argumentative point of view. I am not interested here in the content of any specific conspiracy theory, but in the kind of argumentative force the label has when used by a political speaker to refer to opponents. The examples discussed are public statements by two contemporary center-left American leaders. To show the kind of argumentative force that the label conspiracy theory conveys when used in political discourse, I reconstruct the speakers’ arguments using Walton diagrams. I also apply Tindale's rhetorical notion of making present and Govier’s ideas about logical and social oppositions to advance the idea that a social dynamic based on a radical dichotomy is at play as soon as the label conspiracy theory is mentioned.
Downloads
References
Aaronovitch, David (2009). Voodoo histories: The role of the conspiracy theory in shaping modern history. Jonathan Cape.
Aikin, Scott y Robert, Talisse (2020). Political Argument in a Polarized Age. Reason and Democratic Life. Polity Press.
Bale, Jeffrey (2007). Political paranoia vs. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice 41(1), 45-60.
Boudry, Maarten y Braeckman, Johan (2012). How convenient! The epistemic rationale of self-validating belief systems. Philosophical Psychology 25(3), 341-364.
Brotherton, Robert (2013). Towards a definition of ‘Conspiracy theory’. PsyPAG Quarterly (88), 9-14.
Byford, Jovan (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cassam, Quassim (2019). Conspiracy Theories. Polity.
Coady, David (2006). Conspiracy theories: the philosophical debate. Ashgate.
Creps, E.G. (1980). The conspiracy argument as rhetorical genre. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
Cubitt, Geoffrey (1999). Robespierre and Conspiracy Theories. En Colin Haydon y William Doyle (eds.), Robespierre (pp. 75-91). Cambridge University Press.
Danblon, Emmanuelle y Nicolas, Loïc (2010). Les rhétoriques de la conspiration. CNRS Editions.
Dentith, Matthew (2018). Expertise and Conspiracy Theories. Social Epistemology 32 (3), 196-208. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2018.1440021
Douglas, Karen y Sutton, Robbie (2011). Does it take one to know one? Belief in conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(3), 544-552. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018
Douglas, Karen; Sutton, Robbie; y Cichocka, Aleksandra (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26(6), 538-542. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417718261
Douglas, Karen; Uscinski, Joseph; Sutton, Robbie; Cichocka, Aleksandra; Nefes, Turkay; Siang, Chee; y Farzin Deravi, Ang (2019). Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Advances in Political Psychology 40 (1), 3-35. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12568
Goertzel, Ted (2010). Conspiracy theories in science. EMBO Reports 11(7), 493-499. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.84
________ (1994). Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology 15(4), 731-742.
Goodnight, Thomas y Poulakos, John (1981). Conspiracy rhetoric: From pragmatism to fantasy in public discourse. Western Journal of Speech Communication (45), 299-316.
Govier, Trudy (2009). Logical Opposition and Social Opposition. Cogency 1 (1), 43-57.
________ (2007). Two is a Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited. Proceedings of the 7th OSSA Conference, Dissensus & the Search for Common Ground, University of Windsor, 1-13.
Herman, Thierry y Liberatore, Diane (2022). When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate. Argumentation (36), 155-176. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-021-09558
Hofstadter, Richard (2008). The paranoid style in American politics and other essays. Vintage.
Keeley, Brian (1999). Of conspiracy theories. Journal of Philosophy 96(3), 109-126.
Kramer, Roderick (1998). Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(4), 251-275.
Johnson, Ralph (2000). Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lahrach, Y. y Furnham, Adrian (2017). Are modern health worries associated with medical conspiracy theories? Journal of Psychosomatic Research (99), 89-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.004
Leman, Patrick y Cinnirella, Marco (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review (9), 18-28.
Leone, Massimo; Madisson, Mari-Liis; y Ventsel, Andrea (2020). Semiotic Approaches to Conspiracy Theories. En M. Butter & P. Knight (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 43-55). Routledge.
Levy, Neil (2019). Is Conspiracy Theorising Irrational? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8), 65-76.
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Cook, John; Oberauer, Klaus; y Marriott, Michael (2013). Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Personality Science and Individual Differences 4(73). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00073
Mercier, Hugo (2020). Not Born Yesterday. The Science of Who we Trust and What we Believe. Princeton University Press.
Miller, Shane (2002). Conspiracy Theories: Public Arguments as Coded Social Critiques: a Rhetorical Analysis of the TWA Flight 800 Conspiracy Theories. Argumentation & Advocacy 39(1), 40-56. DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2002.1182157
Mohammed, Dima y Rossi, Maria (2022). The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About COVID-19 Vaccines. En S. Oswald et al. (eds), The Pandemic of Argumentation (pp. 125-144). Springer.
Moore, Alfred (2016). Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic Politics. Critical Review 28(1), 1-23, DOI: 10.1080/08913811.2016.1178894
Muirhead, Rusell y Rosenblum, Nancy (2019). A Lot of People are Saying. The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton.
Oswald, Steve (2016). Conspiracy and bias: argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories. OSSA Conference Archive (168). http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/168[
Oswald, Steve y Herman, Thierry (2016). Argumentation, Conspiracy and the Moon: A Rhetorical-Pragmatic Analysis. En Marcelo Danesi y Sara Greco (eds.), Case Studies in Discourse Analysis (pp. 295-330). Lincom Europa.
Pigden, Charles (2007). Conspiracy theories and the conventional wisdom. Episteme 4(2), 219-232.
Popper, Karl (2006). The conspiracy theory of society. En David Coady (Ed.), Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate (pp.13-15). Ashgate.
Rigotti, Eddo y Greco, Sara (2019). Inference in Argumentation. A topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Springer.
Sunstein, Cass y Vermeule, Adrian (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy(17), 202-227.
Sutton, Robbie y Douglas, Karen (2020). Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: implications for political ideology. Behavioral Sciences (34), 118-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.015
Tindale, Christopher (2015). The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Uscinski, Joseph (Ed) (2019). Conspiracy Theories & the People Who Believe Them. Oxford University Press.
Van Eemeren, Frans y Grootendorst, Rob (1992). Argumentation, communications, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walton, Douglas (2006). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Gordon (1982). Conspiracy and the Paranoid Style: Causality and Deceit in the Eighteenth Century. William and Mary Quarterly 39(3), 402-431.
Wood, Michael; Douglas, Karen; y Sutton, Robbie (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(6), 767-773. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611434786
Zagarella, Roberta y Annoni, Marco (2019). A rhetorical perspective on conspiracies The Stamina case. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8(2), 262-284. DOI: 10.1075/jaic.18006.zag
________ (2018). Conspiracy Ideations in Healthcare: A Rhetorical and Argumentative Analysis. En Steve Oswald y Didier Maillat (eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation Vol. II (pp. 973-988). College Publications.
Zarefsky, David. (1984). Conspiracy Arguments in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association (21), 63-75.
Zonis, Marvin y Joseph, Carig (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology 15(3), 443-459.
