Methodology of film criticism: the journal Movie and the great tradition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051853

Keywords:

Movie, F. R. Leavis, close reading, Screen

Abstract

During the sixties, the journal Movie inherits from Cahiers du cinéma the preferencies for a politique des auteurs and for certain american films. However, never abandoning this tendency towards a “cinema of directors”, the british journal develops a rigorous method of formal analysis and detailed close readings. Some of its members try to apply to cinema the concepts elaborated by F. R. Leavis and the journal Scrutiny in reference to literary criticism. It is precisely this analytic method that will be questioned during the boom of structuralism and post structuralism to which the journal Screen will be asociated in the 70s.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilan, R. P. (1979). The Literary Criticism of F. R. Leavis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bordwell, David (1995). El significado del filme. Inferencia y retórica en la interpretación cinematográfica. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1995.

Buckland, Warren (2016). “The Politics of Form. A conceptual introduction to ‘Screen theory’”. Yannis Tziomakis y Claire Molloy (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Cinema and Politics. Londres: Routledge: 51-61.

Cameron, Ian (1972). Movie Reader. Londres: November books.

—— (1963). Mark Shivas, Paul Mayersberg y V. F. Perkins. “Movie vs. Kael”. Film Quarterly. Otoño: 57-62.

—— (1962). “Films, Directors and Critics”. Movie. Septiembre: 4-7.

Caughie, John (1986). “Movie”. Theories of Authorship. Londres: Routledge: 48-60.

Eagleton, Terry (1975). “Criticism and Politics: The Work of Raymond Williams”. New Left Review. Enero-febrero: 3-23.

Editors of Movie (1963). “Movie Differences”. Movie. Abril: 28-34.

Gibbs, John (2013). The Life of mise en scène. Visual Style and British Film Criticism (1946-1978). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Hilliard, Christopher (2012). English as a Vocation: the Scrutiny Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knights, L. C. y Donald Culver (1932) “Scrutiny: A Manifesto”. Scrutiny. Mayo: 1-5.

Leavis, F. R. (1964) The Common Pursuit [1952]. Nueva York: New York University Press.

Lovell, Alan (1970). “The Common Pursuit of True Judgement”. Screen. Julio-octubre: 76-88.

—— (1969). “Robin Wood. A Dissenting View”. Screen. Abril: 42-55.

Mulhern, Francis (1991). “English Reading”. Homi Bhabha (ed.), Nation and Narration. Londres: Routledge: 250-264.

—— (1981). The Moment of Scrutiny. Cambridge: Verso.

Neale, Steve (1975). “The Re-appearance of Movie”. Screen. Otoño: 112-115.

Perkins, V. F. (2010). “Ian Cameron: A Tribute”. Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism. Agosto: 1-2.

—— (1997). El lenguaje del cine. Madrid: Fundamentos.

—— (1972). “A Reply to Sam Rohdie”. Screen. Invierno: 146-151.

—— (1962). “The British Cinema”. Movie. Junio: 2-7.

Rohdie, Sam (1972). “Review: Movie Reader, Film as Film”. Screen. Invierno: 135-145.

Rosen, Philip (2008). “Screen and 1970s Film Theory”. Lee Grieveson y Haidee Wasson (eds.), Inventing Film Studies. Durham: Duke University Press: 264-297.

Said, Edward (2001). “Opponents, Audiencies, Constituencies, and Community”. Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Harvard: Harvard University Press: 120-132.

Taylor, B. F. (2006). The British New Wave: A Certain Tendency? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Willemen, Paul (1998). “An Introduction to Framework”. Paul Willemen y Jim Pines (eds.). The Essential Framework: Classic Film and TV Essays. Londres: EpiGraph Publications: 1-11.

Wood, Robin (2006). Personal Views: Explorations in Film. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Methodology of film criticism: the journal Movie and the great tradition. (2020). ALPHA. Journal of Arts, Literature and Philosophy, 2(51), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202000051853

Most read articles by the same author(s)