Virtuous loops: A defense of qualitative and quantitative methods on the philosophy of language

Authors

  • David Bordonaba-Plou Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-22012022000541023

Keywords:

Qualitative vs. quantitative, experimental philosophy of language, corpus linguistics, virtuous loops

Abstract

This paper aims to defend the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods in research in language philosophy. Specifically, I would argue that the best option for conducting this type of research is to use methods of corpus linguistics, but also applying qualitative methods. For this, I will argue in favor of the idea of virtuous loops, feedback processes between both methods that can produce findings that would be impossible to discover if only one of the two methods were used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, Joshua; Mallon, Roland; y Weinberg, Jonathan M. (2010). “Accentuate the negative”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1.2, 297-314.

Baker, Paul; Gabrielatos, Costas; y McEnery, Tony (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bluhm, Roland (2013). “Don’t ask, look! Linguistic corpora as a tool for conceptual analysis”, en M. Hoeltje, T. Spitzley & W. Spohn (Eds.), Was dürfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun? Sektionsbeiträge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie e.V. DuEPublico, 7-15.

Braisby, Nick; Franks, Bradley; y Hampton, James (1996). “Essentialism, word use, and concepts”, Cognition, 59, 247-274.

Cova Florian; Olivola, Christopher Y, et al (2018). “De pulchritudine non est disputandum? A crosscultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment”, Mind & Language. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12210.

Dickersin, Kay (1990). “The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its ocurrence”, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263.10, 1385-1389.

Häggqvist, Sören y Wikforss, Asa (2015). “Experimental semantics: The case of natural kind terms”, en J. Haukioja (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Language. London: Bloomsbury, 109-138.

Hansen, Nat (2015). “Experimental philosophy of language”, en Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2014). “Contemporary ordinary language philosophy”, Philosophy Compass, 9.8, 556-569.

Hansen, Nat y Chemla, Emmanuel (2017). “Color adjectives, standards, and thresholds: An experimental investigation”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 40.3, 239-278.

—— (2015). “Linguistics experiments and ordinary language philosophy”, Ratio, 28.4, 422-445.

Knobe, Joshua y Yalcin, Seth (2014). “Epistemic modals and context: Experimental data”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 7.10, 1-21.

Liao, Shen-Yi y Meskin, Aaron (2017). “Aesthetic adjectives: Experimental semantics and context-sensitivity”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94.2, 371-398.

Machery, Edouard; Mallon, Ron; Nichols, Shaun; y Stich, Stephen P. (2004). “Semantics, cross-cultural style”, Cognition, 92, B1-B12.

Mallon, Ron; Machery, Edouard; Nichols, Shaun; y Stich, Stephen P. (2009). “Against arguments from reference”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79.2, 332-356.

Marques, Teresa (2015). “Retractions”, Synthese, 195.8, 3335-3359.

McEnery, Tony y Wilson, Andrew (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

McEnery, Tony y Hardie, Andrew (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nisbett, Richard E. (2003). The Geography of Thought. How Asiasn and Westeners Think Differently … and Why. New York: The Free Press.

Nisbett, Richard E. y Choi, Incheol (2001). “Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition”, Psychological Review, 108.2, 291-310.

Parodi, Giovanni (2008). “Lingüística de corpus: Una introducción al ámbito”, Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 46.1, 93-119.

Rosenthal, Robert (1979). “The ‘File drawer problem’ and tolerance for null results”, Psychological Bulletin, 86.3, 638-641.

Stubbs, Michael (1993). “British traditions in text analysis. From Firth to Sinclair”, en M. Baker, G. Francis y E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1-36.

Strickland, Brent y Suben, Aysu (2012). “Experimenter philosophy: The problem of experimenter bias in experimental philosophy”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3.3, 457-467.

Teubert, Wolfang (2004). “Language and corpus linguistics”, en M. A. K. Halliday, W. Teubert, C. Yallop y A. Čermáková (Eds.), Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum, 73-112.

Tognini-Bonelli, Elena (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Virtuous loops: A defense of qualitative and quantitative methods on the philosophy of language. (2022). ALPHA. Journal of Arts, Literature and Philosophy, 1(54), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-22012022000541023