An availale place in the cosmos: the mental and the physical in Feigl’s realism

Authors

  • David Rojas Lizama Universidad de Santiago de Chile (Chile)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-22012022000551091

Keywords:

Feigl, psychophysical identity, physicalism, realism, monism.

Abstract

This work critically addresses Herbert Feigl's proposal to the mind-body problem within the general framework of his philosophy. For this, we describe succinctly (a) the context of the physicalist theories within which his proposal emerges, highlighting its differences with the positions of Carnap (1932), Place (1956) and Smart (1959), and (b) some relevant elements of the evolution of his own thought, with special emphasis on those elements inherited from previous philosophy that allowed the Austrian philosopher to build his own theoretical framework, characterized mainly by the defense of a “semantic realism” in science. Against this background, we will expose the differences between the central ideas of his 1934 text, centered on the idea o double-language, and his definitive proposal presented in his most influential text of 1958, centered on his theory of double knowledge. Additionally, throughout the article, we support the general view that Feigl's philosophy of mind is a proposal of contemporary value and interest, although not especially original, whose understanding depends notoriously on the more general framework of his philosophy and the traditions that crossed it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, Theodor (2005). Dialéctica Negativa. La Jerga de la Autenticidad. Obra Completa, 6. Ediciones Akal.

—— (1969). Society. Salmagundi, 10-11, 144-153.

Adorno, Theodor, y Horkheimer, Max (1998). Dialéctica de la Ilustración. Fragmentos Filosóficos.Editorial Trotta.

Alonso, Maria Nieves; Blum, Andrea et al. (2005). Dónde nadie ha estado todavía: Utopía, Retórica, Esperanza. Atenea, 491, 29-56.

Buchanan, Brad (2002). Oedipus in Dystopia: Freud and Lawrence in Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave new world’. Journal of Modern Literature, 25(3/4), 75-89. (Trad. del autor)

Budakov, Vasselin M. (2010). Dystopia: an earlier Eighteenth-Century use. Notes and Queries, 57(1), 86-88.

Foucault, Michel (1975). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Penguin Books.

Galeano, Eduardo (2001). Las palabras andantes. Catálogos.

Gordin, Michael; Tilley, Helen y Prakash, Gyan (2010). Utopia/Dystopia. Conditions of Historical Possibility. Princeton University Press.

Jocelyn-Holt Letelier, Alfredo (2000). Historia General de Chile I. El Retorno de los Dioses. Planeta.

Mannheim, Karl (1987). Ideología y Utopía. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Michels, Robert (2008a). Los partidos políticos I. Un estudio sociológico de las tendencias oligárquicas de la democracia moderna. Amorrortu.

—— (2008b). Los partidos políticos II. Un estudio sociológico de las tendencias oligárquicas de la democracia moderna. Amorrortu.

Orwell, George (2010). Fifty Essays. Benediction Classics.

—— (1963). 1984: With an Afterword by Erich Fromm. New American Library of World Literature.

Remmling, Gunter W. (1982). La sociología de Karl Mannheim. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Ruiz Garzón, R. (2014). Mañana todavía: Doce distopías para el siglo XXI. Penguin Random House.

Tearle, Oliver (2013). Brave New Worlds before Huxley and Orwell. Obtenido de Great Writers Inspire: https://writersinspire.wordpress.com/2013/08/28/brave-new-worlds-before-huxley-and-orwell/

Wallerstein, Immanuel. (1995). The End of What Modernity? Theory and Society, 24(4), 471-488.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

An availale place in the cosmos: the mental and the physical in Feigl’s realism. (2022). ALPHA. Journal of Arts, Literature and Philosophy, 55, 31-51. https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-22012022000551091

Most read articles by the same author(s)